The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the transportation infrastructure which can be used to gain entrance to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. The layout is composed of car parking(staff and public), bus station, roundabout and different roads.
In 2007, there was a single parking spot which was used by both hospital workers and public, and was situated at near south of the city hospital. In addition to that, along both sides of the hospital road, there were multiple bus stops. At the end of the hospital road, there was a ring road which was constructed around the main building of the hospital.
In 2010, the parking area was divided into two sections, one for the hospital employees, and the other for the general people visiting the hospital. The new public car park is positioned near the East side of the building. Whereas, the old parking spot is used only by the staffs of the hospital. A new bus station is created in the south-west direction from the city hospital along with two roundabouts at opposite ends of the hospital road.
overall, a substantial change in transportation architecture can be seen over the years, from 2007 to 2010, which includes an introduction of new bus station along with two spacious parking spots, each for the public and employees of the hospital and two roundabouts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ned near the East side of the building. Whereas, the old parking spot is used only by t...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...pposite ends of the hospital road. overall, a substantial change in transportation...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89237668161 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77083601548 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488789237668 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6007462635 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182037030724 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776036026639 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592722286577 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120555653957 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00926971789012 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.