The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the pathways to to gain entrance to a city hospital in years 2007 and 2010. The layouts are composed of car parking(staff and public), bus station, roundabout and different roads.
In 2007, there was a single parking spot which was utilized by both hospital workers and public, and was situated at near south of the city hospital. There were multiple bus stops along the hospital road. Furthermore, At the end of the hospital road, there was a ring road which was constructed around the main building of the hospital.
In 2010, A new parking space is constructed near the East side of the hospital structure, exclusively for the general people visiting the hospital. Whereas, the old parking spot is now used only by the staffs. Moreover, a new bus station is created, replacing the bus stops which is located at the south-west direction of the city hospital along with two roundabouts at the opposite ends of the hospital road.
Overall, a number of significant changes in transportation layout is seen over the years, from 2007 to 2010, which includes an introduction of new bus station along with two spacious parking spots and two roundabouts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
The maps illustrate the pathways to to gain entrance to a city hospital in yea...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e general people visiting the hospital. Whereas, the old parking spot is now used only ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99492385787 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76597116961 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2870169257 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186105356137 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856678091353 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628467681093 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120117377537 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196927478543 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.