Some children find learning history at school very exciting, but many others think it is very boring. In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">
History plays a vital role in providing young people with necessary information regarding their country, culture, evolution of human civilization and many more. Yet, majority of the children in school find it tedious to learn history. Hence, a revolution in teaching methodology has to be done to revitalise the interest in children about history. The following passages will evaluate some ideas regarding prospective effective teaching techniques.
Firstly, we all know that, children love to watch cartoon. Thus, we can provide them cartoons based on historical events and facts. In this way, children can both learn history and have fun simultaniously. Not only that, children can also be introduced to story books, containing graphical characters from the history. Even, fun home works concerning this story books can also boost the enthusiasm in learning history.
Secondly, collection of different group activities will also be an effective way of teaching children history. For example, organizing small plays with children based on historical events can help them learn history indirectly. In addition to that, frequent study tours will provide these children a more direct way of learning the past without even acknowledging it.
In conclusion, their is no doubt about the significance of history lessons for the children. But to make it more enjoyable for future prospects of the nation, some changes has to the introduced in the teaching methodology. Unfortunately, there is no single solution to this problem. But, a combination of informational cartoons, historical story books, plays and study tours can provide this young people with indirect access to historical information. </span><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 16, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...n acknowledging it. In conclusion, their is no doubt about the significance of h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73003802281 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18186664171 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574144486692 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7846619168 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273677406622 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962391793592 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724230418337 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137865797024 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776412075131 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.