The chart illustrates one country’s variety of goods that exported between 2015 and 2016. Also the table demonstrates changes of each products differences between given period. Briefly notice gives that petroleum products exported more than other goods, textiles increased the most throughout given period, although agricultural products remained almost where it was in 2015.
In 2015, petroleum and engineered products occupied most of the exports around 60 billions and 58 billion dollars respectively. Other merchandises that jewelry and agricultural goods exported 30 and 20 billion dollars. However, the least incomes from textiles that around 15 billions in 2015.
In 2016, engineered production and petrol remained leading position that both increased 8,5% and 3% each. Moreover, textiles increased 15,24% than before and agricultural goods sold to abroad almost same as back. Only accessories export decreased over the years until 40 billions. It reduced 5,18% of the exports.
Overall, majority of products exports are increased instead of gems and jewelry. The most risen product was textiles during 2015 and 2016
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ds that exported between 2015 and 2016. Also the table demonstrates changes of each ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77380952381 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74850505645 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.67331877 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8333333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21574671295 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890826094224 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855658723208 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137946002007 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567949704894 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.59 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.