Nowadays, people are facing loads of environmental problems such as excessive traffic and increasing pollution. According to these issues, some people think that the most suitable way to reduce these problems is raise the price of fuel such as gasoline and diesel. It may help to some extent, but I disagree that it is the best solution to solve the problem of environment.
To begin with, the number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population that have enough money to own cars. As a result, rises in gas price could give to them hard feeling among this segment of people but would not impact their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of vehicle diminished due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. This policy could hurt drivers and prospective car owners, and detrimental to the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and improvement of existing public transport.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste of gasoline from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The main culprit may be polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacture industry and burning coal because of the people who live in suburban area and live in a yurt, cannot connected central warming system. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not bring us a blue sky and fresh air. People could better handle this problem that improving policy that factories waste and find a way that control them and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment
To sum up, I pen down saying that, it is not the best way to reduce environmental problems by increasing gas price because such action would hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Solutions such as construction of better transport facilities and development of regulation in the factories could be more effective way to achieve that goal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...endly materials and production equipment To sum up, I pen down saying that, it is...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85882352941 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66316018019 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526470588235 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.9042326196 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.076923077 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243923963749 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816931682102 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858556819697 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149440096769 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748194854367 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.