The table charts illustrate different kinds of city living in a urban and about its compared result of studies in two different year and all the measurement shown by per cent. Brief glance gives information that education, health care, and environment were in good condition throughout the given years. Conversely, the transportation industry was the worst one.
In 1980, Health care system was got the highest rating that 82 per cent but 10 per cent out of 100 thoughts that not good and bad, and only 8% were in bad. By contrast, more than half of the transport was good but one third believed it is in bad condition and remaining 16% were neither. About the education and environment were the same at 72% in angle that acceptable, 5% and 6% each were not acceptable and neither of them were 23% and 22% respectively. Finally, shops and employment were surveyed that two third of both of them were excellent one fifth were in the middle and around 10% were in bad status.
Three decades later, There were some changes that can notice. In good sides, education was better than other industries, at 82%, health, environment, and employment were similar around 70%. Shops was still at the same as before, however, transportation was worse than before at 39% and it was the same as bad (38%) in 2010. There were loads of good changes but on the other side, all the bad results were increased than back. Education 5%, health care 12%, environment and shops 16% both, environment 23% and the last one, transport 38%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...trate different kinds of city living in a urban and about its compared result of ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, however, if, so, still, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.0 314% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73863636364 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57588847707 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9006151294 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833281000065 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338810919079 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687202820096 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793823533995 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695027959737 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.