After industrial revolution, the border of the rich and poor people is emerging noticeable. According to this, a few amount of people’s income is remarkably high than others. While some people reckon that it is useful for a country’s economy, others think it must be controlled by government to make limitation that people’s earning. In my opinion, government should encourage that fewer amount of the population that earn a lot.
On the one hand, those folks who earn a large number of money are the result of their consistency and effort to build it. Almost all the wealthy people had been through hard times that check their consistent. It means that they are faced loads of problems and successfully achieved their goals. Besides, one of the respectable part is their effort to gain all the experiences they have now. Because of it, government shall not control their earnings.
On the second hand, they contribute to the country’s overall economy. This is because of the people who have possess amount of money effect their counties’ exchange rate and export due to their knowledge and money. The USA, for example, world’s richest 3 people are Americans and the US is the richest county of the world. It is undoubtedly that the county’s economy is related to the wealthy people.
In conclusion, earning the numerous number of cash cannot limited by government. My side of view thinks that it can enhance position of the county on the world stage. Furthermore, it is more important that they had enough worked hardly until they achieve their goals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'few amounts'.
Suggestion: few amounts
...erging noticeable. According to this, a few amount of people's income is remarkably h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 39, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... On the one hand, those folks who earn a large number of money are the result of their consisten...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os;s overall economy. This is because of the people who have possess amount of mo...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'possessed'.
Suggestion: possessed
...This is because of the people who have possess amount of money effect their counties&a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08015267176 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8728493196 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576335877863 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0182230171 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.1875 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261843207461 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797512748468 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823949512436 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159390530413 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134645210138 0.056905535591 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.