The graph illustrates 4 different materials' recycling rate throughout the 3 decated in a country. Overall, the most grown recyclesation occurs in Aluminim cans, however, the recycling material that plastic is remained the least through the given period.
Paper and cardboard are the most recycled material within the years that given. But it had fallen to around 60% between 1982 and 1986 then it risen until 80% in 1990. However, it again constantly decreased remained years until 70%. Conversely, glass containers decreased 50% to 40% during 4 years. But it steadely increased until 2010 and it remained 50%.
Aluminium cans and plastics had grown throughout the period but both started to recycled in 1986 and in 1990 respectively. About aluminium cans recycling rate is rapidly grew from 0 to 45 of the recycling until 2010. Although, plastics grown slightly over the period that until 10%.
To sum up, paper and cardboard still the most recycled material over the period. The most grown recycled material was Aluminium. Plastics was shown the least growth through the given period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
...luminium cans recycling rate is rapidly grew from 0 to 45 of the recycling until 201...
^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...om 0 to 45 of the recycling until 2010. Although, plastics grown slightly over the perio...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, still, then, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22727272727 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61501939692 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4132646746 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7692307692 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5384615385 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190998535851 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768846116178 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810771149034 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125696857958 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525305540727 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.