Lately, some parents are refused to vaccinate their children against diseases that can prevent. It is because of their concept to vaccination that can be harmful for children's health and they can fight to sicknesses without any vaccine. This essay will argue why vaccinating for preventable diseases is definitely important in spite of some potential risks.
There is an understending among parents that vaccination will impact negatively to their children. The reasons maybe parents have some kind of instinct that protect their children, because of it they cannot see their children having injection. Moreover, vaccination could activate some diseases if children are hypersensitive from ingredients of vaccine. For instance, there are few recorded cases of children who had vaccinated showed negative reaction to their injections. These few cases give parents fear to vaccinate their child and not only that but also they want to avoid it.
Despite some possible risks, the idea that they are unnecessary and dangerous is completely wrong. Conversely, vaccine can increase children’s immune system which is prevents from diseases. Furthermore, it have prevented loads of sicknesses that end in death. There are examples that humankind sustained from illnesses with the help of vaccination last few decades. These reasons and examples show that the vaccine is necessary and useful part of the prevention from infectious diseases.
In conclusion, I think that having immunity against preventable diseases with the help of vaccine is undoubtedly important and useful for children except the small risks but people do not have to worry that small amount of risks. Even though, they should praise to invention of vaccine
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...prevents from diseases. Furthermore, it have prevented loads of sicknesses that end ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51503759398 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82327823538 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548872180451 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1076836813 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258268444322 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983135346831 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550231309076 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16460392795 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161127945074 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.