Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree.

Vaccinating children has become increasingly unpopular among certain demographics of the society. These people claim that vaccinations are hazardous to children's health and as such are not needed. This essay will argue that why vaccinating against spreadable disease is entirely necessary despite some potential risks.

Parents have always been way of vaccinating their children. They are justifiably worried about injecting their children with unfamiliar substances that could potentially make them sick. Parents naturally feel protective for their children. Indeed, there have been some recorded instances of children unfortunately reacting adversely to their injections.These few instances have bolstered existing fears in parents that vaccinations are not necessary and potentially more dangerous than the possibility of contracting the communicable disease itself.

Despite the minor risks associated with vaccinating children, the idea that they are unnecessary and dangerous is completely preposterous. Vaccines have prevented vast number of deaths over hundreds of years in countries around the world. The number of death so for prevented far outweighs the number of children who have been adversely affected by the immunizations themselves. Some diseases have actually been completely eradicated through vaccination campaigns. Overall, the idea that vaccination are unnecessary and hazardous is ill-informed and dangerous in itself and could potentially lead to a far worse outcome for society.

This essay argued that people who are against vaccinations have a flawed understanding of vaccinations and underestimate the affects of what they believe. In my opinion, vaccinating children is absolutely imperative that is entirely justified despite the small and occasional risk involved.

Votes
Average: 5.1 (8 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
... reacting adversely to their injections.These few instances have bolstered existing f...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, so, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1062992126 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18467922786 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562992125984 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8873517361 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21428571429 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206918644438 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836722274117 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0230748035081 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138564345011 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277409415863 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.86 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.