Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree

In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about the danger of vaccines. This has led to a suggestion that inoculating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also risky. From my perspective, however, this preposterous idea is completely undesirable despite some potential risks.
Undeniably, vaccination is risky. For example, some vaccines, as shown in some medical studies, have triggered adverse reactions or serious side effects among children. This makes parents who have been cautious about vaccinating their children even more believe vaccination is unnecessary. Even vaccinating children carries a slight risk, but the idea that vaccinations are unnecessary and dangerous is completely absurd.
In fact, vaccination can protect children’s lives. Kids do not have a strong immune system, so inoculation can help them prevent diseases. For instance, chickenpox, dengue fever and malaria can be prevented by vaccination. If the children are not vaccinated against the diseases, they may be more likely to be infected with these viruses in the future. Given that vaccination can protect people from infection, many governments have provided children with access to vaccines based on different seasons.
In addition, vaccines are safe. For example, vaccines have prevented a great number of deaths over hundreds of years in countries around the world. The deaths prevented by vaccination outnumber children who have been adversely affected by immunization. Overall, the idea that vaccinations are dangerous is false information and misleading.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that vaccination is compulsory and safe, as its beneficial effects outweigh the rest.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71102661597 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05785226366 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615969581749 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4416270016 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3529411765 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289470127644 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101819361179 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799991987804 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156292253525 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719045906917 0.056905535591 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.