The issue of whether tourism industry should be properly regulated has been a heatedly discussed topic in the recent years, and this has turned into a dilemma facing many. Some people claim that this profit-driven business has had a detrimental impact on the local environment while others do not agree. Personally speaking, I would assert that international tourism is a positive trend as it can promote the development of local economy.
The rationality of checking the development of tourism should be recognized for the following reasons. To begin with, travel industry can lead to air pollution, and this is because there has been a large amount of greenhouse gases discharged from vehicles. For example, the air in Shanghai was very clean a decade ago. However, the booming development of tourism increased the demand of cars in Shanghai. According to the data issued by the local government, there was an uptrend trend in the figures of PM 2.5, with its percentage increasing by 5% from 2010 to 2020. Also, this industry wreaks havoc on ecosystem. For instance, my hometown had large areas of forests in the absence of tourism 50 years ago. The government cut down many forests to make way for modern buildings in order to strengthen this industry. However, this does not necessarily mean that tourism should be regulated.
In fact, international tourism should be developed vigorously. First and foremost, this industry can facilitate local economic progress. For example, Shanghai’s tourism had been developing for the past decade years. Although the air pollution in Shanghai was caused by the growing number of both domestic and international visitors, the GDP in Shanghai had a significant increase, with its percentage of the GDP increasing by 20% between 2010 and 2020. In addition, tourism can improve infrastructure and local facilities. For instance, it was difficult to see international business centers before the advent of tourist industry in my hometown. Since the government put a great emphasis on travel business, they refurbished many old buildings and repaved the originally bumpy roads. Therefore, the number of skyscrapers and financial hubs have been mushrooming in Shanghai.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that tourism is necessary, as its beneficial effects outweigh the rest. Not only can this industry improve economy, but it can have a city urbanized.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24234693878 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94108535748 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533163265306 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1195153028 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4090909091 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17798410651 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537004606003 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462048080807 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118565600113 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712703968728 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.