The issue of whether animal exploitation is justifiable has been a heatedly discussed topic in the recent years, and this has turned into a dilemma facing many. Some people claim that animals should have the same rights as human beings whilst others do not agree. Personally speaking, I would assert that humans can use animals to meet their own needs properly.
The rationality of mistreatment of animals should be recognized for the following reasons. To begin with, abusing animals is illegal, and this is because laws in every country stipulate that cruelty to animals is ethically disrespectful to living things. Also, there is some scientific evidence that animals have their own feelings and cognitive abilities. For instance, dogs can recognize who their owners are, while many animals take excellent care of their cubs as humans do. However, this does not necessarily mean that animals cannot be sacrificed for humans.
In fact, animals are believed to maximize human benefits. First and foremost, animals can contribute to many valuable medical treatments and pharmaceutical results. If we choose not to use animals for medical experiments, then the progress of the medical field will be inevitably hindered to a certain degree. In addition, humans derive most of their nutrition from animals. A recent study has revealed that a large proportion of the protein people consume every day comes from meat and eggs, and that protein is vital for humans to keep healthy.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that humans are allowed to employ animals for survival and sustainable growth, as its positive effects outweigh the rest.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, then, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17948717949 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64798430923 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608058608059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9616564526 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411988836195 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140789166796 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817628231442 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242609448635 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073577618701 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.