The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The graph illustrates the percentage of four different materials (paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics) which underwent the recycling process between 1982 and 2010.
Overall, paper and cardboard were most recycled materials although the trend was downward for these materials while others experienced an upward trend. Even though there were some fluctuations.
It can be seen that,paper and cardboard recycling rate was higher than that other materials well under 70% in 1982.Followed by 5% rate was went up in 1986 but in 1990 suddenly dropped around 65%.In later year (in 1994) fluctuated and rose over 80%. From 1994 to 2010 this rate gradually declined and hitt to 70%.compared to other materials this rate was higher.
In 1982, containers which was made by glass raised by 5%.Moreover, this percentage was significantly decreased (40%) in 1990.in addition in next year the peak was same as it was initially (50%).and started continuously rose through out the period then reached to 60% in 2010.
It is interesting that the two remaining materials (aluminium cans and plastics) followed the same pattern whilst aluminium cans started being recycled in 1986(considerably less than 10%). It was clear that this process significantly went up to 45% in 2010. Least recycling process done by plastics from binging to end of the period (under 5% to closed to 10%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ile others experienced an upward trend. Even though there were some fluctuations. It can...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , paper
...ome fluctuations. It can be seen that,paper and cardboard recycling rate was higher...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Followed
... other materials well under 70% in 1982.Followed by 5% rate was went up in 1986 but in 1...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...but in 1990 suddenly dropped around 65%.In later year in 1994 fluctuated and rose ...
^^
Line 8, column 58, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...rs which was made by glass raised by 5%.Moreover, this percentage was significantly decr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 221, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...ially 50%.and started continuously rose through out the period then reached to 60% in 2010....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'materials'' or 'material's'?
Suggestion: materials'; material's
...t is interesting that the two remaining materials aluminium cans and plastics followed th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 255, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Least'.
Suggestion: The Least
...s significantly went up to 45% in 2010. Least recycling process done by plastics from...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27477477477 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86692160859 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9365760903 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.111111111 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209442886927 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953498846594 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659675306938 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13060541623 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757068867075 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.