The pie chart below depicts main factors which caused land degradation in the world during 1990s. The pie chart is supported by a table which explains the percentage of land degraded in three different regions.
In the world, it can be seen that Over-grazing becomes the biggest factor which caused land degradation in the world, accounted for 35%. Next, Deforestation was at the second place with 30% percentage. After that, Over-cultivation came third with slightly different percentage from Deforestation, at 28%. Lastly, other factors contributed 7% to worldwide land degradation.
In each region, the main factors which caused land degradation the most and the least were different. It can be seen from the table that the main causes of land degradation for Oceania, Europe and North America were Over-Grazing (11.3%), Deforestation (9.8%) and Over-cultivation (3.3%), respectively. Whereas, the factors which caused land degradation the least were Over-cultivation (0%), Over-grazing (5.5%), and Deforestation (0.2%) for Oceania, Europe, and North-America, consecutively. Lastly, regions which experienced land degradation the most were Europe, Oceania, and North America, at 23%, 13%, and 5%, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below depicts main factors which caused...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...ch caused land degradation in the world during 1990s. The pie chart is supported by a table ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, second, third, whereas, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77094972067 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35040001161 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2213536896 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177963696434 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947498115555 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929238980692 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156292156061 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961906753159 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.