The information about the major causes why agricultural land because less productive and how these reasons affected three different regions of the world in 1990 is depicted by the rendered pie chart and table. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
To begin with, the percentage of deforestation causes by worldwide land degradation was 30%. Moreover, over-cultivation and over-grazing were also reasons for agricultural land degradation, the percentage of these causes was 28 and 35 respectively. However, only 3% of other activities were reasons for land degradation around the world.
Moving towards, In North America, the percentage of land degraded for deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing was 0.2, 3.3 and 1.5 correspondingly. Furthermore, the highest percentage of land degraded for deforestation was 9.8 and which was in Europe. In this region, 7.7 and 5.5 percentage of land degraded for over-cultivation and over-grazing. In addition, 11.3% of land degraded by Oceania for over-grazing during the 1990s. There was no land for over-cultivation. However, only 1.7% of land degraded for deforestation in Oceania.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the highest and the lowest percentage of total land degraded in Europe and North America during the 1990s.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59898477157 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53299492386 2.65546596893 133% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1347353938 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9166666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 1.13902439024 966% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180349470305 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812204609158 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992436271622 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151960445775 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119158194559 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.