The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart demonstrates the causes of the declining productivity of farmland and the table represents a description of three places that how these reasons affect the cultivation process in 1990.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that over-grazing was the main reason for the land deterioration. In addition according to the table in Europe, North America and Oceania the deforestation, over-cultivation, and over-grazing were the most responsible causes for land degradation.
To begin with the pie chart, over-grazing was the source of 35% loss of land, while deforestation was in the second. All around the world, 30% of land decay happened due to deforestation. Moreover, over-cultivation was another reason which causes 28% of ground erosion. Furthermore, there were several reasons for land degradation in percentage which was 7%.
Turning to the table, Europe was the topmost for land erosion than all other regions, 23 percent of total land degraded among the three features deforestation causes 9.8%, while over-grazing was the least (5%). In 1990, only 5% of the entire land corrosion had taken place in North America. Here most lands degraded because of over-cultivation (3.3%), whereas there was no soil erosion in Oceania due to this reason. But among 13%, 11% was responsible for over-grazing.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...n reason for the land deterioration. In addition according to the table in Europe, North...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42788461538 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22302973506 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1348888676 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.636363636 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169564436959 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07425003315 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613350775092 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133190743769 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685603890219 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...n reason for the land deterioration. In addition according to the table in Europe, North...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42788461538 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22302973506 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1348888676 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.636363636 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169564436959 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07425003315 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613350775092 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133190743769 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685603890219 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.