The pie chart illustrates causes of worldwide land degradation in four categories (over-grazing, over-cultivation, deforestation and other), while the table outline data of land degradation in North America, Europe and Oceania.
Overall, it is clear that causes of land degradation are caused more or less the same. Furthermore European land is the most degraded by all causes with the exception for over-grazing, moreover, Europe has the largest proportion of land damaged.
In terms of worldwide causes of land degradation, the highest proportion (35%) is caused by over-grazing, deforestation and over-cultivation followed with almost the same percentage (30 and 28 per cent respectively). Other causes are represented by only 7%.
As for specific regions, Europe has the largest proportion of land degraded than any other country, with 23%, its almost two times more than Oceania (13%) and nearly five times more than in North America (5%). Deforestation and over-cultivation shows the highest numbers also in Europe (9.8% and 7.7% accordingly). From the other hadn’t the lowest proportion of land degraded by deforestation is in America (0.2%), while, interestingly, over-cultivation does not cause any harm in Oceania. From the other hand, in Oceania, 11.3% of land is degraded by over-grazing, while in North America and Europe this phenomenon is seen significantly less (1.5% and 5.55 respectively).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ation are caused more or less the same. Furthermore European land is the most degraded by a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...raded than any other country, with 23%, its almost two times more than Oceania 13% ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, as for, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57009345794 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43392771488 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509345794393 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1395496499 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.444444444 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125730380565 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716877422106 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378940085962 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980859538078 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286874037634 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.