The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these
causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart and table depict the dominant causes of land degradation in the worldwide and three specific regions respectively.
Overall, it can be seen that 'over-grazing' was the paramount determinant of the global land degradation, while Europe was the number one region that was truly liable for the degradation.
In terms of universal land degradation, 'over-grazing' stood at approximately a third (35%) of the total, compared to 'other' at 7%, which was the least aetiology of all. Second in the rank was 'deforestation' at 30%, just ahead of 'over-cultivation' at 28%.
Turning to specific territories, almost one-tenth (9.8%) of the land degradation in Europe was caused by 'deforestation', whereas the logging rate for North America was almost nil (0.2%). Next, Europe was slightly higher than North America in both 'over-cultivating' (7.7% vs 3.3%) and 'over-grazing' (5.5% vs 1.5%) accordingly. In terms of Oceania, 'deforestation' (1.7%) and 'over-cultivation' (0%) were marginal as opposed to the rest. Europe headed the list, followed by Oceania and the bottom rank by North America with 23% vs 13% vs 5% correspondingly when it came to the net land degradation.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
for 'Oceania', 'over-grazing' is lost, which is the top feature.
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 185 200
No. of Characters: 923 1000
No. of Different Words: 109 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.688 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.989 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.326 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.946 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.446 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.716 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.097 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, second, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25945945946 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35024393212 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7050068434 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0797965949395 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463901831 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774867545803 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821944247789 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955798816961 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.