The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales (in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales (in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart compares the yearly quantity of rentals and sales of film from a specific store from 2002 to 2011.

Overall, it can be seen that while rentals and VHS sales followed downward trends, Blu-ray sales illustrated upward trends. Another notable feature is that DVD sales experienced some fluctuations throughout the term in the question.

In detail, in 2002, rentals stood at around 180,000, followed by a gradual dip in the remaining years to finish at just over 50,000 in 2011. On the other hand, Blu-ray sales witnessed a steady climb from nearly zero, which was the least total, to approximately 6,000 (2007-2011). Next, there was a rapid slid in the VHS sales roughly from 80,000 to 6,000 in three years time (2002-2005).

In contrast, there was a different pattern for DVD sales. Beginning at just under 50,000 in 2002, there was a rapid swell in the subsequent years until 2000, where it hit a peak at about 205,000. Despite reaching a top, the successive years saw a progressive drop to relatively 180,000 in the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, while, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85635359116 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54030721969 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618784530387 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8844957201 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164783466017 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749426182275 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079477673792 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127603594227 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955631072051 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

flaws:
Beginning at just under 50,000 in 2002, there was a rapid swell in the subsequent years until 2000?

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 181 200
No. of Characters: 845 1000
No. of Different Words: 110 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.668 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.669 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.472 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 53 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 40 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.677 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.418 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.677 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4