The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales (in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given graph chart illustrates the quantity of Rentals and Sales of films from different store like VHS, DVD and Blu-ray items in annually during 2003 to 2011. Overall, it can depict that the sales of the DVD had the most significant number whilst, the sales of Blu-ray had the lowest amount in comparison with others.

It is noticeable that the sale of Rentals had stood at just over 180,000 in 2003, somehow this figure had plummeted up to 60,000 across nine years. Moreover, what is remarkable is the figure of DVD sales had stood at 40,000 in 2002, however, this figure had displayed dramatic upsurge in 2007 up to more than 20,000 and then this figure had conveyed gradually dropped up to 180,000 throughout the period.

Likewise, it is worth to mention that the outline of VHS sales had sharply decreased in the first 4 years from 80,000 in 2002 and 10,000 in 2005 respectively. Furthermore, the sales of Blu-ray showed below remained under 10,000 at the end of the given period.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Overall, it can depict that the sales of the DVD had the most significant number ...
^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emarkable is the figure of DVD sales had stood at 40,000 in 2002, however, this f...
^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is figure had displayed dramatic upsurge in 2007 up to more than 20,000 and then ...
^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is figure had conveyed gradually dropped up to 180,000 throughout the period. ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76300578035 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42573547386 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3899309512 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.333333333 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140822012029 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872336233142 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591548341888 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111140672302 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661559925577 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.