The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The the given three pie charts illustrate the Disbursement of UK School yearly during 1981 1991, and 2001. Overall, it is obvious that the payout for teacher's had the most significant percentage. Conversely the payment for insurance is resulted as the lowest number in the comparison to others.

Admittedly, in 1981, the section of teacher's salaries as stood at 40% and somehow, in 1991, this fraction had upsurged by 10%, however, this rate shown gradual plummeted by 5% throughout the period. Likewise, what is the remarkable is the proportion of insurance conveyed by 2% in 1981 and then shown 1% and 8% upward trend in the year 1991 and 2001 respectively.

On the other hand, it is worth to mention that the quantity of other workings salaries had started with 28% in 1981 and subsequently, this percentage had displayed declined slightly by 6% and decreased dramatically by 7% at the end of the given period.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: The
The the given three pie charts illustrate the D...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'The' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: The; The
The the given three pie charts illustrate the D...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...rs had the most significant percentage. Conversely the payment for insurance is resulted a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Likewise, what is the remarkable is the proportion of insurance conveyed by 2% i...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, likewise, so, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86008084413 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7339006669 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147397238439 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809659910698 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101771218954 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982561840772 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071707051851 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.