The Bar graph illustrates how often the USA citizens consumed meals in fast food restaurants during the year 2003 to 2013. Overall, throughout the surveyed period, it can depict that the percentage of Americans eating cuisine weekly and up to once or twice months had the most significant in the year 2006 and 2007 respectively, whilst similarly the portion of general people Of US eating on a daily basis and never ate remained below across 10 years.
It is noticeable that, in 2003, the number of US local people eaten foods sometimes a week had stood at just over 15%. Subsequently, this figure has shown a sharp upsurge in 2006 up to 20% across 3 years. Somehow, this figure had displayed dramatically declined up to 16% throughout the given period. What is remarkable is the lowest number of Americans consumed foods sometimes in annual had stood at just over 10% at the beginning of the given period. After that, this outline conveyed the same result of 15% at the end of the given period.
Likewise, it is worth to mention that the number of non-eaters in fast food had only picked up to 5% in 2003 in comparison with other periods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ates how often the USA citizens consumed meals in fast food restaurants during th...
^^
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od, it can depict that the percentage of Americans eating cuisine weekly and up ...
^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tage of Americans eating cuisine weekly and up to once or twice months had the ...
^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eating cuisine weekly and up to once or twice months had the most significant in...
^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he number of US local people eaten foods sometimes a week had stood at just over...
^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... eaten foods sometimes a week had stood at just over 15%. Subsequently, this fi...
^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d stood at just over 15%. Subsequently, this figure has shown a sharp upsurge in...
^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the lowest number of Americans consumed foods sometimes in annual had stood at j...
^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2003 in comparison with other periods.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71144278607 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59064046796 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9562372321 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173327488591 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786812188738 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102693047311 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126669025365 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656756487575 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.