The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts illustrate the disbursement of the UK schools yearly during 1981,1991 and 2001. Overall, it is obvious that the payout for teachers' salaries has the most significant amount, conversely the percentage of Insurance is result as the lowest number at the beginning of the given period.

Admittedly, It is noticed that the rate of book resources, other workers' salaries and Furniture/ equipment has the same percentage of payment in the given three periods. Moreover, what is remarkable is the income of teachers' were 5% more in 1991, however, this section shown 15% declined sharply across 10 years.

On the other hand, It is to mention that the quantity of furniture and equipment were conveyed by 15% in 1981, somehow this percentage had displayed plummeted dramatically by 10% and then dropped up to 5%. In 1991, the proportion of furniture and equipment were showcased upward trend by 1%, unfortunately, this fraction of percentage did not added in the end of the given period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'add'
Suggestion: add
...ly, this fraction of percentage did not added in the end of the given period.
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... added in the end of the given period.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, moreover, so, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12727272727 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84839458271 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.9324211387 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978250693901 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612855880912 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926727567996 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704528267094 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519508994048 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.