The given line graph illustrates the consumed from U.S. energy through the fuel between 1980 and 2013, consequently to the 2008 investigate data. The Unit is measured as a quadrillion. Overall, there are six different sorts of energy, where the consumption of petrol and oil is the highest quadrillion, conversely, the use of hydropower energy is the lowest unit in comparison to others.
Admittedly, in 1980, the consumption of petrol and oil stood at 35q. Subsequently, this outline is shown a sharp plummeted in 1985 up to 32q, however, this figure is conveyed a slight upsurge in 1990 up to 24q and thereafter, this figure displayed the strikingly higher number in 2008 up to around 42q and simultaneously, it also estimated to rise dramatically up to 48q across 50 years.
On the other hand, the utilization of natural gas and coal has similar units in 1985, 1997 2005 and, 215 up to 17q, 24q, and 25q respectively. Likewise, the use of nuclear gas and hydropower energy has the same amount in 1985 at the fourth quadrillion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, however, if, likewise, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90340909091 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0159217219 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.0680793658 43.030603864 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116729319211 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569771855355 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548476218024 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785332346221 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652307654172 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.