The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country over a one year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country from 2008 to 2009.
Overall, it can be seen that males surpassed their counterparts throughout the period in the question.
As regards January 2008, males stood at 10%, slightly higher than females at 8%. However, in the next six months (January 2008 to July 2008), there was a rapid drop to around 8% and 7% for males and females respectively. Despite falling, both genders then experienced a sharp swell to 17% (males) and 12% (females) on October 2008 followed by a swift decline to approximately 13% and 8% on January 2009 correspondingly.
From January 2009 to July 2009, there was a marginal fall to 12% from 13% for males, whereas females plummeted to a low of about 7% on April 2009, which was the least total for the mentioned term. Having hit a trough, females then witnessed a prompt growth to finish at nearly 15%. Similarly, regarding the males, the amount rocketed to 23% in the final year, both figures (15% and 23%) on October 2009, being the peak level of the whole span.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 190 200
No. of Characters: 857 1000
No. of Different Words: 113 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.713 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.511 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.621 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 54 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.288 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.437 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.729 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.104 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rocketed to 23% in the final year, both figures 15% and 23% on October 2009, bei...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing the peak level of the whole span.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, similarly, then, well, whereas, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62844023347 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615789473684 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7593191597 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086338296308 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503155879036 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114662398392 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979905384304 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147218925199 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.