The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK in 2002.
The pie chart illustrates financial adversity and difficulty among families in uk in 2002 as a whole. It is clearly observed that the data represented by the graph show certain insightful and interesting fluctuations. Additionally, aged couple have been best condition in living status and sole parents have been worst condition in living status in uk in 2002.
According to the graph, single aged people, aged couples, and without children families in term of living condition almost look-alike, which aged couples were 5 percent, single aged people were 7 percent and without children families were 9 percent. Overall, the pie chart shows the largest population belong sole parents, however, single families without children also had large population, which is sole parents were 26 percent and single families without children were 24 percent. In addition, couples with children families in term of population are similar to other families not listed in the chart and the percentage of couples with children were 15 percent and other families were 14 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'been the best'.
Suggestion: been the best
...uations. Additionally, aged couple have been best condition in living status and sole par...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'been the worst'.
Suggestion: been the worst
... in living status and sole parents have been worst condition in living status in uk in 200...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndition in living status in uk in 2002. According to the graph, single aged peop...
^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... children families in term of population are similar to other families not listed...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35119047619 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70612154584 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7083185474 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.833333333 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202055744787 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122426360839 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764545558718 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187380582028 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677054404279 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.