the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate the types of electricity generation and represent comprehensively sources of renewable energy in Germany and France in 2009.

Overall, conventional thermal plant generated the most electricity in Germany and renewable power station was the least segment. In contrast, nuclear plant was the most significant sector and the lowest energy was generated by conventional thermal in France.

In 2009, Germany and France produced electricity 560 and 510 billion kilowatts respectively. Traditional thermal station accounted for 59.6% in Germany, while about one tenth energy created by thermal plant in France. Rest of the electricity was generated by nuclear power station composed of 23% and renewable station which was 17.4% in Germany. In comparison, nuclear power comprised 76 % and renewable made 13.7% energy in France.

Regarding the renewable plant, biomass and wind were main sources in Germany, at 39.3% and 36.9 % correspondingly, while these plants were around 10% in France. Hydroelectric station generated approximately eight tenth of total renewable energy in France. However, it was only 17.7% in Germany and solar accounted for 6.1% but in France solar composed of 0.9% Both of these countries, geothermal plant did not produce any power.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67708333333 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92877870665 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510416666667 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9486677247 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0909090909 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177077751663 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811444294482 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891515685051 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148734070548 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984583787185 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.