The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity
located in the USA spent and received in one year
The pie charts demostrate the amount of money received and spent over a year in a children's charity in the USA.
Overall, the total of revenue sources was just enough to cover that of outgoings.It is also clear that donated food accounted for most of the income, while program services accounted the majority of spendings.
To begin with, most of revenue sources was provided by donated food, making 86% of the total income. Second come community contributions which collected around 10.4% of the income, followed by program revenue, standing at 2.2%. The remaining categories are investment income, governmnet grants and other income as they accounted very minor percentages, bringing in 0.8% combined.
With regards to the expenditure, only one category was enough to cover nearly all of the outgoings at 95.8%, namely program services. The other two expenditure items, fundraising and management and general, both had little proportions of 2.6% and 1.6% respectively. However, it is worth mentioning that the overall amount of income of $53,561,580, just exceeded the expenditure of $53,224,896.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... just enough to cover that of outgoings.It is also clear that donated food account...
^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing 86% of the total income. Second come community contributions which collected ...
^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...one category was enough to cover nearly all of the outgoings at 95.8%, namely program serv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41860465116 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85814805002 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1405583604 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166879682953 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933251170183 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.21888711311 0.0843802449381 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17885736366 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.284654756053 0.0819641961636 347% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.