The illustrations in the table and the pie chart visualized the total values and sources of fish imported to the US in three year-stamps; which are 1988, 1992 and 2000. Over the years, the figures in billions of dollars keep increasing and give around 67% increment over 12 years. As for the sources, the contributions of each country is changing over the years.
The incline value of fish imported is aligned with the demand happened in the US at the time. Over four years between 1988 to 1992, the rise in percentage is roughly 33%. Eight years after 1988, the different values are about 25% only, in which the amount is less in comparison to the first percentage for only four years.
From sources of the fish imported view, the pie chart records only two specifics countries as the majority and the others. Canada, in which initially contributes 60% of the total, is not giving a stable percentage, conversely, it is declining and touch 28% in 2000. In reverse, China is roughly increasing three times in terms of percentage contribution from 1988 to 2000.
To sum up, the total value of fish imported to the US keeps inclining with the various sources from 1988 to twelve years after.
- New household appliances have resulted in more free time for women and have enabled them to both work and run a home with dependent children.What are the advantages for a family when the mother works?Do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages? 61
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, so, as for, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76442307692 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55996410819 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514423076923 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6567618548 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429744663726 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160733948727 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140775064774 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257441529265 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364817489493 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.