The pie charts below compare the water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world
The pie chart compares and contrasts the data in the differences in the amount of water use in San Diego, California and the world wide, which is measured in percentage.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that while residental is regarded as the main reason in San Diego, the world wide reveales agriculture for the major cause.
Among the sectors, 60% is the proportion of residental in San Diego Country, which is approximately 20% more than that of in California. By contrast, the piece of residental in the world wide is over 8 times as large as the fragment in San Diego. In comparison with the sector of agriculture in world wide, the piece of agriculture in California is smaller by a margin of over 40%. On the other hand, the percentage of agriculture in San Diego consists of a half less than that of in world wide.
In California, 39% and 28% is the proportion of residental and agriculture, respectively. On the other hand, industry has the average segment of the other two.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...er use in San Diego, California and the world wide, which is measured in percentage. A ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...er use in San Diego, California and the world wide, which is measured in percentage. A ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ed as the main reason in San Diego, the world wide reveales agriculture for the major caus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ed as the main reason in San Diego, the world wide reveales agriculture for the major caus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ontrast, the piece of residental in the world wide is over 8 times as large as the fragmen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ontrast, the piece of residental in the world wide is over 8 times as large as the fragmen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... large as the fragment in San Diego. In comparison with the sector of agriculture in world...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...rison with the sector of agriculture in world wide, the piece of agriculture in California...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...rison with the sector of agriculture in world wide, the piece of agriculture in California...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...consists of a half less than that of in world wide. In California, 39% and 28% is the p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...consists of a half less than that of in world wide. In California, 39% and 28% is the p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71186440678 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88829340966 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485875706215 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8542371794 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318061689823 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141723770608 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117039797501 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197691475142 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143712510333 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.