The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts explain the everage domestic emission in state during 50 years. The data showed by percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the most significant increase was food while housing experienced biggest fallThe pie charts explain the everage domestic emission in state during 50 years. The data showed by percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the most significant increase was food while housing experienced biggest fall.
According to the percentage of domestic emission in 1950, housing was the first greatest percentage which had approximately 72,1%. Different from food which was around 11,2% and education was about 3,3% as the second and the third highest percentage. Then, followed by other it was 4,4% while health care was 3,3% and transportation which had 2,4%.
In 2010, it began from food which climbed up from 11,2% to 34%. Followed by other that went up around 15,2% and transportation which rose up 11,3%. Furthermore, health care increasing slowly appropriate 2% that was totally different from housing which plunged to 50% and education reduced to 3%.
According to the percentage of domestic emission in 1950, housing was the first greatest percentage which had approximately 72,1%. Different from food which was around 11,2% and education was about 3,3% as the second and the third highest percentage. Then, followed by other it was 4,4% while health care was 3,3% and transportation which had 2,4%.
In 2010, it began from food which climbed up from 11,2% to 34%. Followed by other that went up around 15,2% and transportation which rose up 11,3%. Furthermore, health care increasing slowly appropriate 2% that was totally different from housing which plunged to 50% and education reduced to 3%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 11,2% to 34%. Followed by other that went up around 15,2% and transportation ...
^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 11,2% to 34%. Followed by other that went up around 15,2% and transportation ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, then, third, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 3.15609756098 570% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23297491039 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75550557729 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.301075268817 0.547539520022 55% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2201553907 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8823529412 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0307540572608 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0193398364545 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288469005532 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0196509557296 0.15604864568 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261958925895 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.07 8.06136585366 75% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.