The given pie charts compare the proportion of the average residents spending on six different living expenses between Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
As can be seen from the charts, the vast majority of the budget of Japanese people went on other goods and services. While for Malaysian people, they spent most of their money on accommodation. Only an insignificant amount of money was spent on health care services in both two countries in the year 2010.
In terms of other goods and services, it accounted for 29% of the average household expenditures in Japan, 3% higher than the Malaysian counterparts. Similarly, the figure for transport in Japan was also higher than those in Malaysia. In fact, Malaysian citizens only spent half as much money as Japanese citizens on transportation.
With regards to the remaining expenses, a hefty 34% of Malaysian householder's expenditures were on housing, compared with less than a quarter of the average spending in Japan. Both two countries spent 30% left to pay for health care and food cost with health care took only 6% and 3% respectively in Japan and Malaysia.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04324324324 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84928963505 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4411070078 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161852949024 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680353382613 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636381459335 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110246503877 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580272591712 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.