The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.

The pie chart illustrates the average household expenses in a country in 1950 and 2010.

Overall, It can be seen that there are six different types of expenses and the pattern of expenditure has significantly changed over the years from 1950 to 2010. In the year 1950, The majority of the total amount was Housing with more than 72% followed by Food with 11.2% and Education at 6.6%. Furthermore, Healthcare and Transportation seem to be the least with 2.4% and 3.3%. Last but not the least Other expenditure stands at 4.4% of overall expenditure.

On the other hand, The year 2010, has changed the way people use their money for different purposes. The majority started spending more on food with 34%, Whereas, Housing stood at 22% followed by other spendings at 19.2%. People started improving their way of transportation by spending almost 14%. Education and health care remain at the last position with 6.3% and 4.5%.

To conclude this report, I,d like to mention that Education and Health care still hold the last position and it should be looked upon for improvements.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , d
... and 4.5%. To conclude this report, I,d like to mention that Education and Heal...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, still, whereas, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95604395604 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66829389229 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9283041889 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174291581474 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864979217128 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17204774833 0.0843802449381 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17939187596 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.239714073121 0.0819641961636 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.