The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
Two pie chart given below illustrate the pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in year 2010. The data present in percentage. Overall it can be seen that the biggest between Japan and Malaysia have the biggest percentage was Housing in Malaysia meanwhile the most negative trend was health care in Malaysia.
In the one hand, between Japan and Malaysia which the biggest percentage was housing 34% in Malaysia which the biggest category, followed by other goods and services was 29% which the second higher. for the smallest percentage there are in Malaysia namely in health care was 3%.
On the other hand, between Japan and Malaysia have degree percentage which almost the same between other goods and service, health care and food which have range was 3%, but difference the significantly was transport and housing namely with range 10% and 13%.
From the two pie charts can be accepted conclusion, which was the biggest percentage in Malaysia namely housing. Japan and Malaysia have range the same percentage the biggest 3% and range significantly percentage was housing and transport namely 13% and 10%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...rvices was 29% which the second higher. for the smallest percentage there are in Ma...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15957446809 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51408436416 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43085106383 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7322073665 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290875566526 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168497937297 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.25275522192 0.0843802449381 300% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207420096304 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206521670818 0.0819641961636 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.