The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of various types of energy production of France in year 1985 and 2005.
Overall, in both year coal was produced most amount of energy. The most significant sources were coal and gas and together they were generated more than half of the energy. Other sources had played the least amount of role of energy generation in France. Moreover, there was very little increased in percentage from 1995 to 2005.
In 1995 coal is covered 29.80% of energy production and very slight change in the percentage (30.93%) in year 2005. In terms of gas it was increased little more than coal (29.63% to 30.31%) in this ten years period.
Where percentage was risen for all the sources from 1995 to 2005 but in case of petro it was dropped almost 10% (29.27% and 19.55% respectively). Nuclear sources was produced more energy (10.10%) in 2005 than in 1995 (6.40%). On the other hand looking at this entire chart it was expended more for other sources from 1995 to 2005 than coal, nuclear, gas and petro. There 4.90% energy was generated by other sources in 1995 and 9.10% was counted for year 2005.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69387755102 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26148786501 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474489795918 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8891758477 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6363636364 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123707442681 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06859149309 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920023632435 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132241422486 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120216436366 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.