The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The pie charts give information about the percentage of five different source of energy production in France in two different time period 1995 and 2005. Overall it is seen that over half of the energy were being generated from gas and coal in both years.
Both coal and gas had almost equal contribution in power sector 29.80% and 29.63% respectively in 1995 and in 2005 the figure for coal and gas were 30.93% and 30.31%. Coal and gas consumption for energy production changed marginally (1%) in 2005 compare to 1995. However use of fossil fuel dipped in 2015 by 10% from 29.27% to 19.55%.
A surge of atomic energy was seen in 2005 for energy production. In 1995, the contribution of nuclear energy to national power grid of France was only 6.40% whereas in 2005 it increased by roughly 4% reached 10.10%.
Similarly, other source of energy accounted for less than 5% energy production in 1995. This figure rose to 10.10% in 2005 which was a significant change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'source' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sources'.
Suggestion: sources
... about the percentage of five different source of energy production in France in two d...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... marginally 1% in 2005 compare to 1995. However use of fossil fuel dipped in 2015 by 10...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75595238095 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52217349264 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7038492321 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7777777778 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20010254947 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094646301367 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104635276483 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143336962031 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114748219974 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.