The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The pie charts illustrate information about the comparison of various kinds of energy consumption of France in one decade. The data are shown in percentage. Overall, the highest energy production in 1995 was gas, while coal was the biggest after one decade. There was a gradual increase can be seen in the production of Nuclear, Gas, Coal, and other energy throughout the period, whereas Petro continued to decrease
Looking at the fourth energy consumption, there was a highest increase of energy production which was Nuclear, approximately 6% in 1995 to above 10% in 2015. Moreover, for Gas and Coal rose gradually about 0.5% and 1% for their emitted respectively. Furthermore, other source of energy consumption were grew steadily from 4.90% to 9.10% by the end of the period.
Regarding the remaining energy consumption, petro was emitted by people over 29% in 1995. Towards the end of the period, there was a sharp decline on Petro to approximately 19% by the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...e decade. To begin with, there was a highest increase of energy production w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 630.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 119.0 196.424390244 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30283395202 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82627917324 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655462184874 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8305108069 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.75 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.875 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156784692931 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651709886264 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101460613625 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10371441354 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101193002883 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.