The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010
The chart provides information about the growth of GDP per year for three states from 2007 to 2010. The data are shown in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the GDP growth in Japan increased continually, opposite for Tunisia, whereas in Ecuador it fluctuated
To begin with, in 2007 the rate of GDP in Tunisia was the highest with above 6% compared with Japan and Ecuador whose only had under 4%. In addition the GDP growth for Tunisia was decline dramatically and go down to 3%. In contrast, GDP rate for Japan was rose significantly and reach a peak to approximately 6% by the end of the period.
Regarding the data from Ecuador, the GDP rate of Ecuador was around 3% in 2007. Continued to 2008, there was a sharp increased of the GDP growth in Ecuador to above 4%. Lastly, in 2009 Ecuador was fell significantly to below 2% before it grew gradually to above 2% by the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntinually, opposite for Tunisia, whereas in Ecuador it fluctuated To begin w...
^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...and Ecuador whose only had under 4%. In addition the GDP growth for Tunisia was decline ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, regarding, whereas, in addition, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5243902439 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5952698014 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518292682927 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1437827766 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281170096845 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136089009872 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145653499367 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210130463464 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124236699841 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.