The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992
The pie charts illustrate information about how many the workforce was ordered in 1992 in Great Britain. The data are shown in percentage, divided into manual and non-manual occupations. Overall, it can be seen that the greatest percentage for both genders was on non-manual occupations, female was clerical or related, whereas male on managerial and professional. Both sexes were least their proportion in general labourers.
Looking at the first categories, male had the biggest on managerial and professional with 36%, while female only about 29%. Similarly, on craft or similar, there was a huge difference of 21% between the genders pie charts which the male was 24% and female just 3%. However in clerical or related, female had the greatest percentage with 31%, while man was dramatically lower with 6%. Likewise, the female employee was higher on other manual than the male employee by 1% at around 27% and 26%.
In terms of the remaining occupations, both genders set aside the similar number for other non-manual at around below 10%. Lastly, none of the genders were least on general labourers for male (approximately 2%) was over double that of female (1%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'genders'' or 'gender's'?
Suggestion: genders'; gender's
...as a huge difference of 21% between the genders pie charts which the male was 24% and f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ch the male was 24% and female just 3%. However in clerical or related, female had the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, likewise, look, similarly, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16753926702 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7906790547 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581151832461 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9434466954 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0767901058831 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380881016485 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799800744676 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0546861846588 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365072225623 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.