The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors' contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
The two pie charts illustrate how different industry sectors contributed to the economy of Turkey percentage-wise in the years 2000 and 2016.
Overall, at the beginning of the period, construction contributed the least to the economy of Turkey, and agriculture was the most significant economic sector. In comparison, at the end of the period, healthcare and education became the largest economic segment, and the lowest contribution was made by financial, business, and other services.
The construction sector accounted for 3% of Turkey's economy in 2000 and experienced a more than threefold increase to one-tenth in 2016. Economic income from trade, utilities, and transportation was 14% in 2000 and experienced a slight growth of 2% in 2016. At the beginning of the period, manufacturing and finance, business, and other services made up 8% and 5% of Turkey's economy, respectively, and these figures rose to 12% and 8% in 2016.
Agriculture, which comprised almost a quarter of Turkey's economy in 2000, fell to 14% in 2016. In 2000, economic outputs from the government and leisure and hospitality sectors were at 12% and 17%, respectively, and both decreased by 3% after the 16-year period. In contrast, contributions from the healthcare and education sectors remained constant in both years at 17%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33816425121 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19314535743 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502415458937 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.550504633 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.777777778 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375619272523 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173460910113 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170283300429 0.0843802449381 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281465224587 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199156684492 0.0819641961636 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.