The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007

Essay topics:

The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.

The provided pie charts offer a comprehensive representation of primary factors influencing individuals’ decisions to migrate to or depart from the UK in the year 2007.
Overall, employment was the primary determinant of these migration choices. Over half of immigrants were drawn by definite job offers and formal study opportunities, while nearly same number of the emigrants left the UK either to secure employment or actively seek job prospects.
Approximately 30% of the immigrants arrived in the UK due to secure job prospects, a figure almost identical to the 29% of emigrants who left the UK for employment opportunities. Another prominent factor driving migration to the UK was formal education, over a quarter of immigrants seeking educational opportunities. However, it is interesting to note that only 4% of emigrants left the UK on educational purposes.
Furthermore, a noteworthy 22% of emigrants departed while actively seeking for employment, in contrast to the population of individuals who immigrated for the same reason was only 12%. Family reunion was also a compelling factor for both immigration and emigration, with percentages around 15% and 13% respectively. A substantial 32% of people left the UK in 2007 without any specified reason but only 17% people entered the UK in these ‘’No reason stated and other” categories.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and 13% respectively. A substantial 32% of people left the UK in 2007 without an...
^^^
Line 4, column 468, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...UK in these ‘’No reason stated and other” categories.
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, as for, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45497630332 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34646157281 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578199052133 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1721603743 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.888888889 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271433735117 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11047098942 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817218637858 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17340917071 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907151809719 0.0819641961636 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.