The information about the changes in real estate value in three nations such as Algeria, China and Argentina. The years under consideration is from 2007 and 2010.
Thus, from an overall analysis it is crystal clear that rate of property in China has upward trend, whereas, a opposite trend is followed by Algeria. Argentina has zigzag trend which has shown least amount in last year.
At the first glance, it can be clearly seen from chart that in 2007, the value of real estate in Algeria was registered the highest ratio that accounted about 6.0%. It was followed by the Argentina have proportion of 3.0%. However, 2.0% was recorded in the case of China.
Moving further, in 2008 price of property in China and Argentina was increased by 2% and 1.5% each. Whereas China continuously increased which reached at peak by more than 6.0%, while Algeria have downfall until last year that was seen same as Argentina was in 2007. Moreover, in Argentina after a year decreased which the difference of 3%, as well as, in 2010 price again increased which reached near 2.5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...at rate of property in China has upward trend, whereas, a opposite trend is followed ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rty in China has upward trend, whereas, a opposite trend is followed by Algeria. ...
^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'shown the least'.
Suggestion: shown the least
...a. Argentina has zigzag trend which has shown least amount in last year. At the first glan...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll until last year that was seen same as Argentina was in 2007. Moreover, in Arge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, thus, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8097826087 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41807519846 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9381797584 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0959804098466 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439565495082 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422331908964 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613424527337 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383767513454 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.