One of the most noticeable trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that number of nations individuals are purchasing varieties of household items such as TV, microwave, oven, and rice cooker. There are both pros and cons. In my opinion, the former apprehension outdo the latter.
To commence with, there are deluges arguments in favor of buying large number of household products. The most preponderant one is that advancement in technology. To elaborate it, nowadays, all companies making chances it their product in which they are installing new feature those make their work easy, like new microwaves control temperature as according to need which also help in saving electricity. It cannot only contribute to reduce work load, but also leads to numerous other benefits in various fields saving energy. Thanks to the wide range of advantages households offers, masses can enhance the productivity and quality of their lives with much ease and efficacy. Needless to say, all these merit stand in one good stead as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned propositions is that it is only likely to help one excel and thrive in varied area by entertainment. This is because, now people have busy working scheduled which make them stressed for which they need something which can help in reducing stress level so people buy television to do so.. For instance, the study result published by the government of Australia between March 2013 and April 2014, clearly indicate that television is the best source for decreasing burden. Hence, it is clear that why many are in favor of this viewpoint.
However, there are some pitfalls that are overwhelm the potential benefits of households. The primary one is that people are becoming lazy. To explain it, when individuals use technological things such as oven, rice cooker and some other produces, so they need less to do less physical work by leads them towards laziness. It is clear that demerits have far-reaching impacts on community.
To conclude, having pondered over above-stated, it is crystal clear that despite of the drawbacks the benefits of buying households are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... level so people buy television to do so.. For instance, the study result publishe...
^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'overwhelmed'.
Suggestion: overwhelmed
...wever, there are some pitfalls that are overwhelm the potential benefits of households. T...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, so, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17615176152 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80736310323 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582655826558 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7005670717 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171939157405 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410311608064 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378773648731 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833750584981 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209791068334 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.