The graphs illustrate the difference in the percentage of the kinds of power which was produced in France in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that the percentage of gas, coal, and nuclear experiences an upward trend; and, the percentage of coal registers the highest figures for 10 years.
Looking at the figure of the petro, it shows an opposite trend to gas, coal, and nuclear power. In 1995, it made up less than a third but after ten years, it decreased sharply to a fifth. In the year 2005, the percentage of energy production by coal was the majority of 29.8 percent. The figure for gas and nuclear power accounts for 29.63 and 6.4 percent in each. During 10 years, they showed a slight increase in their percentage with 30.93, 30.31 and 10.10 percent respectively. The figure for other growth nearly doubles from about 10 percent in 1995 to 9.1 percent in 2005.
The graphs illustrate the difference in the percentage of the kinds of power which was produced in France in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that the percentage of gas, coal, and nuclear experiences an upward trend; and, the percentage of coal registers the highest figures for 10 years.
Looking at the figure of the petro, it shows an opposite trend to gas, coal, and nuclear power. In 1995, it made up less than a third but after ten years, it decreased sharply to a fifth. In the year 2005, the percentage of energy production by coal was the majority of 29.8 percent. The figure for gas and nuclear power accounts for 29.63 and 6.4 percent in each. During 10 years, they showed a slight increase in their percentage with 30.93, 30.31 and 10.10 percent respectively. The figure for other growth nearly doubles from about 10 percent in 1995 to 9.1 percent in 2005.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 312.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70512820513 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48369932307 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.294871794872 0.547539520022 54% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8995714852 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881501984412 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472964325921 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627504160525 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707677015752 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589787347922 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.0 8.06136585366 74% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.