The pie charts illustrates changes in electricity production by source in New Zealand and Germany over three decades (1980-2010).
Overall, it is clearly seen number of producted energy in both countries more or less doubled. While in New Zealand the most energy units had been produced from Coal, Germans producted more or less the same number from atoms. Although, there is was no evidence of energy producted in nuclear plants in New Zealand.
Almost three quarters of all energy produced in New Zealand was from fossil fuels. The main source for energy production in 1980 as well as 2010 was Coal (56 units and 150 units). When number of units producted from water increased slightly, Petroleum and Natural Gas plummeted similarly to only 2 units from its beginning of 11 and 30 units respectively.
In terms of Germany, in 1980, there is visible a wider range of sources in energy production. Although, like New Zealand, in Germany, almost three quarters of energy came from fossil fuels. However, in 2010, this trend reversed, and nearly three quarters of all producted energy came from nuclear plants (155 units). Interestingly, water which represented almost one quarter (46 units) in New Zealand, producted only 2 units of energy in Germany.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ore or less the same number from atoms. Although, there is was no evidence of energy pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...same number from atoms. Although, there is was no evidence of energy producted in ...
^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e number from atoms. Although, there is was no evidence of energy producted in nucl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, so, well, while, as well as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08737864078 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59566697388 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533980582524 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.389015997 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2727272727 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211666439112 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110071979661 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132841490002 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202125897708 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178473423334 0.0819641961636 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.