The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The given pie charts contrast the consumption of electricity divided by 5 main features in two countries in 1980 and 2010. Overall, total amount of electricity that was used almost doubled in Germany and New Zealand , from 107 units to 214 in the first country and from 127 to 200 in the second one.
According to the presented data, the structure of electricity consumption in New Zealand changed from 1980 to 2010. In the 80s nearly one-third(30 units) of all spent units had natural gas while within a time span of 30 years this number dramatically decreased to 2 units. However, other proportions the almost the same, for instance, the most significant part relates to the coal.
As it can be seen in the charts related to Germany the consumption changed a lot. In 1980 coal and petroleum had the same portion (28 units) and nuclear was approximately at the same rate (20 units) whereas in 2010 the amount of electricity spent on nuclear significantly increased to 155 units and natural gas consumption showed downward trend.
Finally, the provided pie charts show that Germany and New Zealand differently used electricity source and the structure of consumption changed in both countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Trang Carina | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | noor salah | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Sơn Joyous | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that government should spend money on new building rather than renovating existing building. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 84
- Everyone of us should become a vegetarian because eating meat can cause serious health problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 65
- The line graph shows estimated sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of Dirhams. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ided by 5 main features in two countries in 1980 and 2010. Overall, total amount ...
^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lmost doubled in Germany and New Zealand , from 107 units to 214 in the first coun...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the almost the'. Did you mean 'almost the'?
Suggestion: almost the
... to 2 units. However, other proportions the almost the same, for instance, the most significan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gnificant part relates to the coal. As it can be seen in the charts related to...
^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In 1980 coal and petroleum had the same portion 28 units and nuclear was approxi...
^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gas consumption showed downward trend. Finally, the provided pie charts show th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, third, whereas, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83440656011 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6718915369 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334972508272 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157313912867 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128899438086 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232185424136 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109728027452 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.