The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
The presented charts, representing data in the percentages, compare Korea, Sweden, and UK in terms of the treatment methods used in each country to deal with hazardous waste.
Looking from the overall prospective, it can be noticed that the biggest share of dangerous waste was recycled in the Republic of Korea, while in European countries the waste was simply stored underground.
As getting into details, the amount of rubbish that put underground accounted to 22 percent in Korea, whereas this number reached 55% in Sweden and accumulated even further in the United Kingdom, making it 82%. Incineration amounted to 9% in the Republic of Korea, that is 7% higher than in UK and, at the same time, almost less than a half of the amount of hazardous waste fired in Sweden.
Recycling as a way of dealing with rubbish was of use only in Korea with its share reaching 69% and in Sweden amounted to one fourth of the treated waste. Chemical treatment as well as Method of dumping at sea Were used to chosen only by UK, and both traced the value of 8%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[5]
Message: Did you mean 'choose'?
Suggestion: choose
...s Method of dumping at sea Were used to chosen only by UK, and both traced the value o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69189189189 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58011726734 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.8369367264 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.666666667 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8333333333 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0984500065452 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494535329211 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449228564886 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667624153443 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395000056183 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.