The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The pie charts reveal information on the procedure of treating poisonous garbage in the Republic of Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Generally speaking, three countries concentrate on different methods of dealing with waste. While Korea emphasises on recycling, Sweden focuses on underground and fire is prioritised in the UK.
From a quick glance at the statistics indicating treatments in Korea, recycling makes up of just under 70%, which is three times as much as burying into the soil with more than 20%. The last place is occupied by incineration of nearly a tenth. On the contrary, the highest proportion in protocols to decompose poisonous rubbish in Sweden is underground treatment with more than a half. In addition to this, recycling and heating ways are considerably lower with a quarter and a fifth correspondingly.
Moving on to analyse the remaining pie chart illustrating several procedures in the United Kingdom, decomposing dangerous waste resulting in landfill sites accounts for the most substantial statistic at more than 80% meanwhile discharging into the ocean and using chemicals are similar at nearly 10%. Consequently, the data of incineration is the smallest at 2% exactly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36842105263 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1021572335 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8811823646 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11641551504 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416600817502 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386663628394 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769320924274 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238170779073 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.