The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given pie charts give information about the way hazardous disposal is handled among nations. Looking from an overall perspective, both Sweden and the UK used underground methods the most, while the Korean government chose recycling waste.
To begin, the rate of recycled method in Korea was dominant on the chart, at just under 70%. In addition, burying and fire destruction were less utilized, at 22% for the former and nearly 10% for the latter.
Moreover, Swedish authorities implied underground measures for tackling dangerous disposal mainly, at over 50%, which was followed by the occupation of recycling at 2 times lower. The percentage of incineration was one-fifths, which made up the least. Similarly, the United Kingdom dealt with harmful wastes by underground methods, which was a majority at over 80%. Both chemical treatment and sea dumping occupied the same rate at 8%. Just 2% of waste products were handled by burning.
Interestingly, it is evident that the UK had the largest range of solutions to deal with toxic wastes among other nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to recycle'.
Suggestion: to recycle
...most, while the Korean government chose recycling waste. To begin, the rate of recycle...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23837209302 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76408703242 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686046511628 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3825507627 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102520570174 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413388028996 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352575082172 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577917963399 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00935490691593 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.